cathyr19355 (
cathyr19355) wrote2009-02-05 10:50 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
A frighful discovery
Tonight, I was looking at the latest crop of recommendations for me on Amazon when I came across this CD: Rockabye Baby: Lullaby Renditions of Tool.
Yes, you got that right; Lullaby Renditions of Tool. It turns out that there's a whole line of covers of rock classics with titles of the formula "Rockabye Baby: Lullaby Renditions of X". The arrangers redo the originals as slowed-down instrumentals featuring gentle instruments such as glockenspiel and vibraphone, and market the results to rock-loving new parents as infant lullabies.
I started looking up some of the other covers after finding the Tool lullaby remake. I wasn't surprised to find the Beatles in the list. But Led Zeppelin? U2? Metallica? Pink Floyd? Some of the songs were still pretty good, even with the Stepford Lullaby treatment, while others were unrecognizable. The cover art on all of these has to be seen to be believed. Just chase the links.
The Nine Inch Nails one was still disturbing, despite the lullaby treatment. (Yes, oh yes, they had one for Nine Inch Nails. It's right here.)
Good grief. Is nothing sacred anymore?
Yes, you got that right; Lullaby Renditions of Tool. It turns out that there's a whole line of covers of rock classics with titles of the formula "Rockabye Baby: Lullaby Renditions of X". The arrangers redo the originals as slowed-down instrumentals featuring gentle instruments such as glockenspiel and vibraphone, and market the results to rock-loving new parents as infant lullabies.
I started looking up some of the other covers after finding the Tool lullaby remake. I wasn't surprised to find the Beatles in the list. But Led Zeppelin? U2? Metallica? Pink Floyd? Some of the songs were still pretty good, even with the Stepford Lullaby treatment, while others were unrecognizable. The cover art on all of these has to be seen to be believed. Just chase the links.
The Nine Inch Nails one was still disturbing, despite the lullaby treatment. (Yes, oh yes, they had one for Nine Inch Nails. It's right here.)
Good grief. Is nothing sacred anymore?
no subject
Have you heard of Stretched Beethoven? A guy took a recording of the 9th Symphony and stretched it out to a full twenty-four hours:
More here:
http://www.park.nl/park_cms/public/index.php?thisarticle=118
no subject
And then there is "Run For Your Life;" all the Beatles music in order of release, as one file, sampled down to just over an hour:
http://blog.wfmu.org/freeform/2007/10/the-complete-be.html
no subject
no subject
You can still recognize some of the songs.
And I swear at one point the Beatles shout "Oi! Oi! Oi!"
no subject
no subject
And then there is "Revolution 1" which is "Revolution" sampled down then slowed to produce a bizarre, jittery sound.
no subject
no subject
A number of songs - including several by the Beatles - supposedly contain "backwards masking," words and phrases reversed and put into the recording as a concealed clue or subliminal message. The problem is that the human brain is hardwired to find spoken words, so people do find things, even when there's not really anything there.
The funniest was "I sing this song for Satan" from the Mister Ed theme.
no subject