cathyr19355: Stock photo of myself (Default)
cathyr19355 ([personal profile] cathyr19355) wrote2009-02-05 10:50 pm
Entry tags:

A frighful discovery

Tonight, I was looking at the latest crop of recommendations for me on Amazon when I came across this CD: Rockabye Baby: Lullaby Renditions of Tool.

Yes, you got that right; Lullaby Renditions of Tool. It turns out that there's a whole line of covers of rock classics with titles of the formula "Rockabye Baby: Lullaby Renditions of X". The arrangers redo the originals as slowed-down instrumentals featuring gentle instruments such as glockenspiel and vibraphone, and market the results to rock-loving new parents as infant lullabies.

I started looking up some of the other covers after finding the Tool lullaby remake. I wasn't surprised to find the Beatles in the list. But Led Zeppelin? U2? Metallica? Pink Floyd? Some of the songs were still pretty good, even with the Stepford Lullaby treatment, while others were unrecognizable. The cover art on all of these has to be seen to be believed. Just chase the links.

The Nine Inch Nails one was still disturbing, despite the lullaby treatment. (Yes, oh yes, they had one for Nine Inch Nails. It's right here.)

Good grief. Is nothing sacred anymore?

[identity profile] stickmaker.livejournal.com 2009-02-06 04:58 am (UTC)(link)


And then there is "Run For Your Life;" all the Beatles music in order of release, as one file, sampled down to just over an hour:

http://blog.wfmu.org/freeform/2007/10/the-complete-be.html

[identity profile] cathyr19355.livejournal.com 2009-02-06 06:28 am (UTC)(link)
That's silly--and I need to listen to it sometime. Thanks for the pointer.

[identity profile] stickmaker.livejournal.com 2009-02-06 02:49 pm (UTC)(link)


You can still recognize some of the songs.

And I swear at one point the Beatles shout "Oi! Oi! Oi!"

[identity profile] cathyr19355.livejournal.com 2009-02-07 06:19 am (UTC)(link)
Now I *really* need to listen to it. But not tonight--I'm beat.

[identity profile] stickmaker.livejournal.com 2009-02-08 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)


And then there is "Revolution 1" which is "Revolution" sampled down then slowed to produce a bizarre, jittery sound.

[identity profile] cathyr19355.livejournal.com 2009-02-09 02:06 am (UTC)(link)
Isn't there a version of Revolution that was played backward, in a search for secret messages or something silly like that?

[identity profile] stickmaker.livejournal.com 2009-02-09 02:52 am (UTC)(link)


A number of songs - including several by the Beatles - supposedly contain "backwards masking," words and phrases reversed and put into the recording as a concealed clue or subliminal message. The problem is that the human brain is hardwired to find spoken words, so people do find things, even when there's not really anything there.

The funniest was "I sing this song for Satan" from the Mister Ed theme.