posted by [identity profile] brandyeileen.livejournal.com at 05:20am on 24/05/2005
Give him smooches, back.

My point was more that it seems a lot more useful to use human cadavers as a food source, rather than further polluting our planet, as well as taking up useable land, by pumping them full of chemicals and then sticking them in the ground, inside of a coffin which would make it hard for the soil to benefit, in any way, from such an internment. I most definately wouldn't want to eat humans, mostly for the same reason I tend to avoid shellfish and other marine-based meals. I mean, if I ate humans who ate fish, then that's just that much more mercury and lead in my body. No thanks! ;)

I think it's probably a good idea it remains taboo, as well. I just think that the current trend of embalming and internment to be even more grotesque than cannibalism. My family is already well-aware of my final wishes, in that regard.
 
posted by [identity profile] cathyr19355.livejournal.com at 03:22am on 25/05/2005
Smooches relayed. :-) He was much pleased.

I'm not much in favor of the practice of embalming either. I much prefer the idea of cremation, after culling any donatable organs. It can be done without fanfare and without embalming the body first--that was how my mother-in-law dealt with my father-in-law's remains. My father-in-law was over 6 feet tall, but his post-cremation remains fit in a cardboard box that was about 6 inches high and 8 inches wide. After cremation, the remains can be buried to help the soil as you suggest (we buried my father-in-law's remains at the foot of a tree).

But even though embalming is bad, I think cannibalism would be worse. I'm glad we agree on that.

March

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
        1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9 10
11 12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23 24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29 30
 
31