cathyr19355 (
cathyr19355) wrote2006-12-03 01:21 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Somewhere tonight, Murphy is laughing....
It's final. I'm not buying the 2001 Honda.
Why? Because I was at the dealership this afternoon, looking at a different car just in case, and I decided to give it another test drive, since they'd just *replaced* the damn torque converter.
I had driven it no further than a half mile when the "check engine" light went on again, accompanied by the blinking of the light around the selected gear.
Even Sales Guy admitted this killed the deal. Because that means we have no idea what, if anything, is wrong with this car, and I have no intention of buying a potential problem.
So instead I ended up looking at two different other cars. One is the Toyota Avalon I originally went there to see. The Avalon is a large 4-door sedan, much larger than the Suburu I had had or the Honda that just washed out of the race. It's a 1999 model, with about 61,000 miles, but it looks like a new car, and has the smooth, silent, ride and feel of a land cruiser. Carfax says no sign of accidents or other problems, and Consumer Reports likes the model. It has beautiful leather upholstery, a built-in CD player, and power-just-about-everything. And the price (about $11,500) was a tiny bit cheaper than they were charging for the 2001 Honda. I asked why the low price, and it turns out they just lowered it, because it's been around for awhile and they're hoping to move it. (This is a Honda shop, and they don't get many Toyotas, or land cruisers, there, even as trade-ins).
In light of my lack of parking talent, I never really wanted a land cruiser, and while I like power locks, I'm not really used to making my seat do the Watusi with power controls.
The other car I looked at is a 2004 Honda Civic LX. 53,000 miles. A four-door sedan, rather similar to the one that washed out. They just got it as a trade-in, so it hasn't been through their conditioning/certification process yet. That likely will happen Monday, Sales Guy said.
My only concern is that it has a few small body dings... just enough to make me wonder if this car has a ... history. And the 2004 Honda will cost more, too, because it's newer. The dealership hasn't fixed a price for it yet, but Sales Guy says it will likely be a bit over $13,000.
I told Sales Guy I'd touch base with him Monday and tell him which of the two, if either, he should take to my mechanic for a look-see. I hope I can manage to decide by then.
Why? Because I was at the dealership this afternoon, looking at a different car just in case, and I decided to give it another test drive, since they'd just *replaced* the damn torque converter.
I had driven it no further than a half mile when the "check engine" light went on again, accompanied by the blinking of the light around the selected gear.
Even Sales Guy admitted this killed the deal. Because that means we have no idea what, if anything, is wrong with this car, and I have no intention of buying a potential problem.
So instead I ended up looking at two different other cars. One is the Toyota Avalon I originally went there to see. The Avalon is a large 4-door sedan, much larger than the Suburu I had had or the Honda that just washed out of the race. It's a 1999 model, with about 61,000 miles, but it looks like a new car, and has the smooth, silent, ride and feel of a land cruiser. Carfax says no sign of accidents or other problems, and Consumer Reports likes the model. It has beautiful leather upholstery, a built-in CD player, and power-just-about-everything. And the price (about $11,500) was a tiny bit cheaper than they were charging for the 2001 Honda. I asked why the low price, and it turns out they just lowered it, because it's been around for awhile and they're hoping to move it. (This is a Honda shop, and they don't get many Toyotas, or land cruisers, there, even as trade-ins).
In light of my lack of parking talent, I never really wanted a land cruiser, and while I like power locks, I'm not really used to making my seat do the Watusi with power controls.
The other car I looked at is a 2004 Honda Civic LX. 53,000 miles. A four-door sedan, rather similar to the one that washed out. They just got it as a trade-in, so it hasn't been through their conditioning/certification process yet. That likely will happen Monday, Sales Guy said.
My only concern is that it has a few small body dings... just enough to make me wonder if this car has a ... history. And the 2004 Honda will cost more, too, because it's newer. The dealership hasn't fixed a price for it yet, but Sales Guy says it will likely be a bit over $13,000.
I told Sales Guy I'd touch base with him Monday and tell him which of the two, if either, he should take to my mechanic for a look-see. I hope I can manage to decide by then.
no subject
no subject
The other problem is that the break-even point for a new hybrid over a new conventional vehicle of the same model comes at about 100,000 miles - and for a used car, that is probably even farther off, since you're that much closer to the very expensive battery replacement.
no subject
The bigger problem for me is that I do not make a lot of long road trips, and the current models of hybrid get their best gas mileages (and therefore cost savings) on long road trips.
no subject
It's not at all uncommon to see a hybrid be rated for better mileage in city driving than highway.
no subject
no subject
In any case, yeah, the break-even point is not close. We tend to own cars for 15 years or so, and expect to get there eventually, but it's a way off.
no subject
no subject
no subject
For that, a little parking practice is well worth it. :-)
no subject
no subject
no subject
I did look for customer reviews on line, and I see that the Avalon gets decent gas mileage and has ABS brakes too which are also pluses. In fact, the earlier Avalons (such as the 1999 and 2001 models) got better reviews than the current 2006, for which some people reported road noise problems, cruise control problems, and a nasty sulfur smell when braking.
no subject
no subject
I know a little about the transmission problems with the Grand Am, but don't have a lot of the details.
As for buying GM cars, my first car was a Dodge Aries, which has given me a permanent allergy to anything made by Chrysler. Coincidence? I fear not. :-(