[T]he original would have made a very dull movie….
Absolutely true.
*sigh* Perhaps I could have enjoyed it if I didn't know that it was supposed to be connected to a classic SF short by one of my favorite classic SF "authors." As it is, I am unable to evaluate it without reference to the story, and it's nothing like the story, and therefore I am not going to see it because I would hate it, no matter how good a movie it might be on its own terms.
I will say this: I respect them enormously for changing the name. That was the right thing to do. I am sure that that will enable some people to enjoy the movie in a manner unconnected to the story. It's just insufficient for me to do so.
You're entitled not to want to see the movie, and to feel that it somehow impinged on a story you respect in its own terms. There are very few stories about which I would feel so strongly about an adaptation/change/homage/borrowing, but I respect the fact that you clearly do so.
As it was, we probably wouldn't have gone to see the movie without knowing of the connection. I had been very unimpressed by the trailer, and esrblog had no interest until he was told by a friend that the Padgett story had inspired it.
(no subject)
*sigh* Perhaps I could have enjoyed it if I didn't know that it was supposed to be connected to a classic SF short by one of my favorite classic SF "authors." As it is, I am unable to evaluate it without reference to the story, and it's nothing like the story, and therefore I am not going to see it because I would hate it, no matter how good a movie it might be on its own terms.
I will say this: I respect them enormously for changing the name. That was the right thing to do. I am sure that that will enable some people to enjoy the movie in a manner unconnected to the story. It's just insufficient for me to do so.
(no subject)
As it was, we probably wouldn't have gone to see the movie without knowing of the connection. I had been very unimpressed by the trailer, and